About 5,250,000 results
Open links in new tab
  1. Re: Adams Family 1600's Durham - Genealogy.com

    Oct 25, 1999 · 2.GEORGE2 SMITH (THOMAS1) was born Abt. 1595 in England, and died 1661 in Ipswich, Mass.. He married TEMPERANCE Abt. 1620 in England.She was born Abt. 1600 …

  2. William. Roberts Fam., 1617- 1 - Genealogy.com

    William Roberts (b Abt. 1617 in Ireland, d. Augg 6, 1689 in Milford Connecticut is an ancestor of the Roberts brothers (William, John, David & Henry) of the Watauga Settlements of East …

  3. New South Wales - Australia - Genealogy.com

    Oct 20, 2012 · Research New South Wales in the Australia forums on Genealogy.com, the new GenForum!

  4. Clayton family in Virginia and - Genealogy.com

    Oct 4, 2001 · 1.FRANCIS1 CLAYTON was born Abt. 1725 in Petersburg, Chesterfield County, Virginia, and died Aft. November 04, 1771 in Chesterfield County, Virginia.He married …

  5. Re: GOODE/PENDWILLE 1500s ENGL - Genealogy.com

    Jun 4, 1998 · Walter GOODE was born Abt. 1490 in Whitley, England. He married Joan WHITSTON Abt. 1511 in Whitstone, England; daughter of William Whitston.Their …

  6. How to prove $ (AB)^T=B^T A^T$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange

    Sep 18, 2015 · Check a very simple case, say 1*2 & 2*3, you will find the problem.

  7. James Armstrong Family/Ireland - Genealogy.com

    Apr 17, 2001 · James ARMSTRONG b: Abt. 1780 in Ireland d: Abt. 1840 in Franklin Township, Coshocton, Ohio Number of children: 10 +Rachel WINNER b: 1801 in Pennsylvania d: Abt. …

  8. Re: Jeremiah Greene b. Abt. 17 - Genealogy.com

    Jun 16, 2001 · By genealogy.com user June 18, 2001 at 12:56:12 In reply to: Re: Jeremiah Greene b. Abt. 1750 Maxine (Hilton) Orosco 6/16/01 Maxine, thank you for your …

  9. How to prove that $ (AB)^t = B^tA^t$ - Mathematics Stack …

    Jan 17, 2019 · I agree, but I could not have done that step and then reached the conclusion that (AB)^t = B^tA^t, no?

  10. Hyde Family - 1000-1300s ENG - Genealogy.com

    Hyde Family - 1000-1300s ENG By genealogy.com user March 05, 2000 at 12:34:27 This is just the tip of the iceberg (so to speak) Descendants of John* de la Hyde 1 John ...